MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Gijs Brouwer [205th] vs Nathan Ponwith [776th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Brouwer 1 - 0 Ponwith

They have played 2 sets in total, with Brouwer winning 2 and Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Brouwer and Ponwith was at the M25 Tulsa, 18-06-2019, First, Hard with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Gijs Brouwer 1
Nathan Ponwith 0
Brouwer vs Ponwith H2H Profile
Brouwer Stats Ponwith
33% (2-4) YTD Win/Loss 36% (5-9)
1 Head-to-Head 0
205 Ranking 776
114 Highest Rank 367
29 Age 27
L Plays R
6 Titles 3
57% (330-245) Career Total W/L 54% (184-158)
$294,840 Career Prize Money $0
1 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Brouwer VS Ponwith H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-3
cross
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71% ( 44 of 62)
1st Serve %
65% ( 35 of 54)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 20 of 35)
28% ( 5 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 6 of 19)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
42% ( 26 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 28 of 54)
64
Total Points Won
52

Brouwer VS Ponwith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Brouwer Vs Ponwith H2H Stats
Gijs Brouwer Brouwer Stats Nathan Ponwith Ponwith
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 6
2 Aces (Total) 0
5 Total Double Faults 3
1:31:0 Average Match Time 1:31:0
71% (44/62) 1st Serve % 65% (35/54)
70% (31/44) 1st Serve Win % 57% (20/35)
28% (5/18) 2nd Serve Win % 32% (6/19)
71% (5/7) Break Points Won % (Total) 25% (2/8)
52% (28/54) Return Points Win % 42% (26/62)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Gijs Brouwer vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Brouwer 1 - 0 Ponwith

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brouwer has won 36.94% of points on their second serve, while Ponwith has won 44.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brouwer, in recent form, has won 42.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 44.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.35% and 30.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Brouwer has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 50.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Brouwer has won 53.49% of matches played (W/L 23/ 20), with Ponwith winning 40.91% (W/L 18/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 101/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 83/ 71). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 39/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 10/ 17).
  • Player level: In the last year, Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.54% of matches (W/L 15/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brouwer winning 1 times and Ponwith being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brouwer winning 2 and Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Brouwer and Ponwith was at the M25 Tulsa, 18-06-2019, First, Hard with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Brouwer and Ponwith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brouwer winning 0 times and Ponwith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brouwer winning 0, and Ponwith 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brouwer has played against opponents with an average rank of 259 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 364.8.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brouwer has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Brouwer has converted 26.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 37.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Gijs Brouwer Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mattia Bellucci
    Player
    Gijs Brouwer
    58% ( 21 of 36)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 29 of 43)
    6
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    90% ( 19 of 21)
    1st Serve Won
    38% ( 11 of 29)
    67% ( 10 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    19% ( 7 of 36)
    Rtn Points Won
    58% ( 25 of 43)
    54
    Total Points Won
    25
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Gijs Brouwer
    Player
    Max Houkes
    64% ( 35 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 36 of 57)
    5
    Aces
    1
    5
    Double Faults
    0
    77% ( 27 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 19 of 36)
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    33% ( 4 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    35% ( 19 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 27 of 57)
    63
    Total Points Won
    49
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Kyrian Jacquet
    Player
    Gijs Brouwer
    58% ( 45 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 44 of 68)
    9
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    69% ( 31 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 31 of 44)
    59% ( 19 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 8 of 24)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    35% ( 27 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 29 of 68)
    79
    Total Points Won
    66
    L
    7-5 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Jaime Faria
    Player
    Gijs Brouwer
    60% ( 34 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 38 of 53)
    5
    Aces
    7
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 27 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 29 of 38)
    70% ( 16 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 5 of 15)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    25% ( 14 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 19 of 53)
    62
    Total Points Won
    48
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Taisei Ichikawa
    Player
    Gijs Brouwer
    53% ( 31 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    76% ( 42 of 55)
    0
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 24 of 42)
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    37% ( 22 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 28 of 55)
    65
    Total Points Won
    49
    L
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Gijs Brouwer
    Player
    Bernard Tomic
    84% ( 47 of 56)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 26 of 50)
    7
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    70% ( 33 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 19 of 26)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 7 of 24)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    34% ( 19 of 56)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 24 of 50)
    61
    Total Points Won
    45
    W
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Lukas Klein
    Player
    Gijs Brouwer
    70% ( 33 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 32 of 53)
    11
    Aces
    4
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    82% ( 27 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    62% ( 13 of 21)
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    28% ( 13 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 20 of 53)
    54
    Total Points Won
    46
    L
    7-6(7) 2-1 ret. H2H
    F
    cross
    Gijs Brouwer
    Player
    Lucas Pouille
    78% ( 71 of 91)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 40 of 67)
    6
    Aces
    6
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    72% ( 51 of 71)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 28 of 40)
    50% ( 10 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 13 of 27)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    11% ( 1 of 9)
    33% ( 30 of 91)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 26 of 67)
    87
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    6-4 7-6(2) H2H
    SF
    cross
    Gijs Brouwer
    Player
    Ugo Blanchet
    81% ( 57 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 41 of 66)
    3
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    72% ( 41 of 57)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 27 of 41)
    54% ( 7 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    31% ( 22 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 26 of 66)
    74
    Total Points Won
    62
    W
    6-4 7-5 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Gijs Brouwer
    Player
    Benjamin Bonzi
    65% ( 68 of 104)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 68 of 108)
    8
    Aces
    9
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    71% ( 48 of 68)
    1st Serve Won
    72% ( 49 of 68)
    50% ( 18 of 36)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 17 of 40)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    37% ( 38 of 104)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 42 of 108)
    108
    Total Points Won
    104
    W
    4-6 6-3 7-5 H2H

    Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Andres Martin
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    69% ( 38 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 29 of 49)
    1
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 17 of 29)
    65% ( 11 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 7 of 20)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    35% ( 19 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 25 of 49)
    61
    Total Points Won
    43
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Nathan Ponwith
    Player
    Ian Mayew
    55% ( 58 of 105)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 67 of 96)
    3
    Aces
    1
    9
    Double Faults
    1
    62% ( 36 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    42% ( 28 of 67)
    40% ( 19 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    62% ( 18 of 29)
    44% ( 7 of 16)
    Break Points Won
    24% ( 5 of 21)
    48% ( 50 of 105)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 50 of 96)
    105
    Total Points Won
    96
    W
    6-3 7-6(7) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alex Rybakov
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    69% ( 34 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 42 of 75)
    1
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    85% ( 29 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 24 of 42)
    60% ( 9 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 18 of 33)
    20% ( 3 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    22% ( 11 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 33 of 75)
    71
    Total Points Won
    53
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Chun Hsin Tseng
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    42% ( 33 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 52 of 87)
    8
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    76% ( 25 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 35 of 52)
    67% ( 30 of 45)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 16 of 35)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    29% ( 23 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 36 of 87)
    91
    Total Points Won
    74
    L
    6-2 3-6 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Andres Martin
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    66% ( 35 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 35 of 53)
    1
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    74% ( 26 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    46% ( 16 of 35)
    61% ( 11 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 6 of 18)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    30% ( 16 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    68
    Total Points Won
    38
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Nathan Ponwith
    Player
    Evan Zhu
    50% ( 29 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 31 of 50)
    1
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 19 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 23 of 31)
    72% ( 21 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 9 of 19)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    31% ( 18 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 18 of 50)
    58
    Total Points Won
    50
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Cannon Kingsley
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    73% ( 27 of 37)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 29 of 52)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    78% ( 21 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    38% ( 11 of 29)
    70% ( 7 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 10 of 23)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    24% ( 9 of 37)
    Rtn Points Won
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    59
    Total Points Won
    30
    L
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Nathan Ponwith
    Player
    Evan Bynoe
    64% ( 53 of 83)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 52 of 80)
    0
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    60% ( 18 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 11 of 28)
    55% ( 6 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    41% ( 34 of 83)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 38 of 80)
    87
    Total Points Won
    76
    W
    3-6 6-2 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Louis Tessa
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    67% ( 61 of 91)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 74 of 125)
    1
    Aces
    4
    3
    Double Faults
    9
    59% ( 36 of 61)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 42 of 74)
    47% ( 14 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 21 of 51)
    50% ( 8 of 16)
    Break Points Won
    64% ( 7 of 11)
    45% ( 41 of 91)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 62 of 125)
    112
    Total Points Won
    104
    L
    7-5 4-6 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Trey Hilderbrand
    Player
    Nathan Ponwith
    57% ( 54 of 95)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 70 of 104)
    14
    Aces
    2
    10
    Double Faults
    2
    72% ( 39 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 40 of 70)
    46% ( 19 of 41)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    39% ( 37 of 95)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 47 of 104)
    105
    Total Points Won
    94
    L
    7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Brouwer & Ponwith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Gijs Brouwer Brouwer Stats Nathan Ponwith Ponwith
    57% (330/245) Win/Loss 54% (184/158)
    56% (728/563) Sets Win/Loss 53% (416/372)
    53% (6466/5755) Games Win/Loss 51% (3776/3592)
    0.35 Aces Per Game 0.2
    2114 Aces Total 707
    0.24 Double Faults Per Game 0.25
    1411 Total Double Faults 899
    1:17:54 Average Match Time 1:17:58
    447.11 Average Opponent Rank 395.39
    66% (22215/33834) 1st Serve % 57% (9516/16629)
    70% (15542/22215) 1st Serve Win % 67% (6330/9516)
    50% (5811/11619) 2nd Serve Win % 50% (3525/7113)
    42% (1430/3415) Break Points Won % (Total) 41% (665/1613)
    40% (13665/34431) Return Points Win % 39% (6374/16326)
    57% (319/559) Best of 3 Sets Win % 54% (183/340)
    60% (3/5) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
    43% (72/168) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 49% (38/78)
    50% (73/147) Deciding Set Win % 53% (56/105)
    89% (332/295) 1st Set Won, Won Match 83% (187/155)
    11% (332/37) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 17% (187/32)
    14% (242/34) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 18% (155/28)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...